Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 117, 453–475. Is it just a matter of personality? On the role of life satisfaction in childbearing behavior. Le Moglie, M., Mencarini, L., & Rapallini, C. Population and Development Review, 31(3), 407–445. Partner + children = happiness? The effects of partnerships and fertility on well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(4), 759–773. Becoming a parent and relationship satisfaction: A longitudinal dyadic perspective. The joint effects of marriage partners’ socioeconomic positions on the risk of divorce. American Political Science Review, 65(4), 991–1017. The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 82(1), 110–130. You can not be happier than your wife: Happiness gaps and divorce. Marry your like: Assortative mating and income inequality. Greenwood, J., Guner, N., Kocharkov, G., & Santos, C. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 639–653. Spousal dissimilarity, race, and marital dissolution. Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. ![]() E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Ĭlark, A. In UNECE (Ed.), How generations and gender shape demographic change (pp. The happiness commonality: Fertility decision in low-fertility settings. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1141–1187.īillari, F. An economic analysis of marital instability. Fertility from a couple perspective: A test of competing decision rules on proceptive behaviour. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9(2011), 307–325.īauer, G., & Kneip, T. Does parenthood increase happiness? Evidence for Poland. The role of family orientations in shaping the effect of fertility on subjective well-being. Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Institutional change, happiness and fertility. European Sociological Review, 29(2), 316–333.Īassve, A., Mencarini, L., & Sironi, M. Explaining attitudes towards demographic behaviour. Happiness and childbearing across Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 15(3), 283–299.Īassve, A., Goisis, A., & Sironi, M. Childbearing and well-being: A comparative analysis of welfare regimes in Europe. Our results show that failing to acknowledge that the subjective well-being of both partners matters for the inherently joint decision making of childbearing can lead to an incomplete view of how subjective well-being affects fertility.Īassve, A., Mazzuco, S., & Mencarini, L. We, moreover, find support for a multiplicative effect of partners’ SWB on the decision to have a first child. ![]() For the transition to the second child, we find that couples in which the woman declares to be happier or less happy than usual have a lower risk of childbirth. ![]() Specifically, we observe that couples in which either partner is happier than usual are more at risk of having the first child, but the effect is stronger with higher happiness of the woman. Using data from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) and event history models estimated separately by parity, we find that in a couple, women’s happiness matters more than that of the male partner in terms of having the first child. The existing literature has so far considered the role of the individual’s subjective well-being on fertility, neglecting the importance of the partner’s well-being.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |